US Spying And The Moral High Ground
Updated: 1:16pm UK, Thursday 24 October 2013
All nations spy, but not all nations claim they have liberal values and transparent government.
For those that do, it is a little embarrassing to be caught spying on your friends and military allies.
To be caught listening in on the private phone calls of the head of government of an ally is to be embarrassed on a different level.
Hence we see the presence of the US Ambassador to Berlin at the German foreign ministry.
Mr John B Emerson was called in to see foreign minister Guido Westerwelle for a touch of "clarification" on remarks made by the White House on Wednesday night.
This follows a call to Chancellor Angela Merkel's office by the Der Spiegel newspaper.
It asked a question which was probably based on some of Edward Snowden's files, to which it has access: "Has the US been tapping the mobile phone of the Chancellor?"
Der Spiegel says Germany's Federal Intelligence Service had enough information for Mrs Merkel to phone Barack Obama and ask the same question.
The Chancellery was confident enough to make public the call.
Within an hour, White House spokesman Jay Carney came up with an answer: "The President assured the Chancellor that the United States is not monitoring, and will not monitor, the communications of the Chancellor."
Sadly, at the time of writing, the White House press corps did not appear to have asked the obvious question which arises from such a slippery answer: "OK - is not, and will not monitor, but has it monitored?"
President Obama has now found himself on the receiving end of phone calls from several indignant presidents.
The leaders of Brazil, Mexico, France, and Germany have all made it clear they take a dim view of activities of the American intelligence agencies in their own countries.
Brazil's President, Dilma Rouseff, even went so far as to cancel a state visit to Washington DC.
The US administration is now asking itself how much damage all of this is causing.
Some officials argue that spy storms come and go, but relationships survive.
Others agree about survival but say the relationships will be weakened and that America's standing in the world is damaged in the long term.
It is well known that Russia spies on Britain, which spies on China, which spies on America, which spies on … well, everyone it now appears.
Spying on enemies is obvious, and spying on trade partners is tolerated even if measures are taken to prevent it.
Spying on allies is frowned upon even if most countries do it while taking counter measures.
The French are well known to have been trying to steal everyone's business secrets for decades, and very good they are it too.
The golden rule is: don't get caught and don't embarrass us in public and remember, when it comes to allies, there are limits.
If the French and Americans wanted to know their respective positions ahead of a crucial UN Security Council vote, which was in the balance, they might use a variety of measures to find out.
If some of those measures were, perhaps, questionable and became public, it would be embarrassing but, behind the scenes, both sides would shrug their shoulders.
However, listening into the private calls of a head of government of a key ally is crossing a line - it is personal, a question of trust in a personal relationship, and it is impossible to justify in public.
Therefore, if the claims are true, the Americans have a stark choice.
In their democracy, with its open government, and liberal values, what has the greater value? The information you get from spying on friends at the highest levels or the moral standing you have among those friends and global public opinion?
Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Germany Summons US Envoy Over Spying Row
Dengan url
http://jidatlancip.blogspot.com/2013/10/germany-summons-us-envoy-over-spying-row.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Germany Summons US Envoy Over Spying Row
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Germany Summons US Envoy Over Spying Row
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar